15 Feb
2005
15 Feb
'05
4:31 a.m.
On 02/14/2005 07:38 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
Larry Evans wrote: [snip]
Could you give more details so I can find it? I just posted it. You should see it by now. If not: I see it.
Here's what I am planning:
1) I intend to refactor fusion to allow different forms of containers with varying characteristics. I plan to have: a) vector b) list c) set d) map [snip] 4) As I intend to follow the MPL mold, I will follow MPL naming convention (e.g. "at" instead of "get", vector instead of tuple). I'm confused because an instance of mpl::vector<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains no data but an instance of a tuple<T1,T2,...,Tn> contains an instance of T1,T2,...,Tn. Aren't both needed?