Gennaro Prota wrote:
Are you suggesting that to me? If I had a HP-UX_ia64_aCC I wouldn't even bother looking at the test reports.
At Emil's request, I've started a full test. Just FYI. -boris
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 9:30 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Tests are a mess
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Emil Dotchevski <emil@revergestudios.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Gennaro Prota <gennaro.prota@yahoo.com> wrote:
Unsatisfied symbol "boost::exception_detail::refcount_ptr<..." This is my fault thanks for spotting it. I'm looking into it right now.
This is a weird link error, but the "missing" destructor is inline.
It's also the destructor of a class that should have nothing to do with dynamic_bitset (but who knows... it might be used by something used by something used by something else; the joys of Boost coupling)
It seems to be a build problem specific to the HP-UX_ia64_aCC test site. The relevant change was introduced in revision 48634. This revision has been tested, and has not caused any problems, on any other test sites.
I'm noticing that the HP-UX_ia64_aCC test is incremental. I have seen similar failures before which were "fixed" by a non-incremental build.
Rather than panicking, I suggest trying a non-incremental build
Are you suggesting that to me? If I had a HP-UX_ia64_aCC I wouldn't even bother looking at the test reports.
-- Genny
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost