Le 12/04/12 12:44, Neal Becker a écrit :
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 12/04/12 01:45, Neal Becker a écrit :
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 12/04/12 01:34, Neal Becker a écrit :
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 12/04/12 00:25, Neal Becker a écrit : > Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: > >> Le 11/04/12 14:37, Neal Becker a écrit : Sorry for the confusion: my comment was about run-time specified fixed point type. If using compile-time specification of integer and fractional bits, then you're correct - no need for those constructor parameters.
Do you really need a run-time fixed-point library? If yes, what is your context of use.
I use if with python, but for the purpose of this discussion, we can probably ignore run-time. Oh, I remember it now.Yes, I would prefer we concentrate in a compile-time solution.
Vicente
Having said that, my main use case will be run-time, because I'm primarily using hybrid python-c++ systems. So while we can plan a design of compile-time, I want to always keep run-time in mind. If the boost solution does not support run-time, I will need to convert it by hand. Hopefully that will not be difficult.
At least whatever solution is proposed for boost, I hope some thought is given to how it could be used or modified for runtime, and that would not be made more difficult than necessary.
I will try to take your concern in account, but this clearly duplicates the library, even if the run-time design should be easier. Best, Vicente