"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Steven Watanabe <steven@providere-consulting.com> Fecha: Sábado, Marzo 17, 2007 9:13 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [intrusive] Review Para: boost@lists.boost.org
AMDG
Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com> writes:
I don't think that current is a good name for the function that gets an iterator from the value_type. How about something a little more descriptive like get_iterator, iterator_from, or to_iterator?
"iterator_from" sounds good.
What about "iterator_to"? I don't get the rationale for the "from" suffix. If i is an iterator and *i==x, one usually says "i is an iterator to x", right?
I understand your point, but I believe the idea behind the name is that the function returns an iterator from a reference to an element. I'll throw out another possibility: iterator_at. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard