On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Paul A. Bristow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I can understand that you are still spitting feathers about the crass handling of B2/Cmake, but this seems a big legalistic sledge hammer to try to solve that issue, and others too.
You do know that I could actually care less about what build system Boost uses? And that has nothing to do with this.
It is quite reasonable for the Steering Committee to opine that the number of users of Boost might be boosted by providing a way to use another build tool, but ultimately, the library writers will control what happens by voting with their feet, or fingers.
Nah.. Programmers have a long history of accepting edicts about the tools and methods that others proclaim. And I doubt this will be any different from that history. Let's keep muddling on ;-)
Right.. Lets accept what is given without any say on it.
and Carry On Coding :-)
Sure.. We'll rowing to the drum beat. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net