on Mon Jun 01 2009, "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart-AT-sig.com> wrote:
Daniel James wrote On Monday, June 01, 2009 3:29 PM
2009/5/31 Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk>:
Oh, I've got an objection myself. That part of the document concerns the C++ standard documentation guidelines, where this isn't appropriate. So instead I added an extra paragraph to the introduction:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/53551/trunk https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/more/writingdoc/structure.html#introdu...
The introduction is not a good place to document content requirements. I suggest something like the following:
Daniel and Robert, thank you for being on top of this one. I'm sure we'll end up with something good! -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com