13 Mar
2010
13 Mar
'10
7:36 p.m.
On 13 March 2010 19:18, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't call that a "logging library" since it doesn't actually write logs. It's more like a binding or a wrapper.
Call it whatever you wish. I assume it'd include a simple backend for basic tasks (which might just write to a stream or something), although by default it'd do nothing. Daniel