
3 May
2005
3 May
'05
6:57 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message news:d58c5t$lbl$1@sea.gmane.org...
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
well, you can't call it io::char :-)
Yeah, I know. Since char_<> would be an abomination, the alternative is char_type. I've got the same problem with int_type.
one could of course say
io::character io::integer
Not bad! Thanks. I wonder if the nested type should be called character as well. I've taken it for granted that I should use the standard library convention, but maybe that's not so important: struct my_filter { typedef char character; typedef input_filter_tag category; ... }; Jonathan