Hi,
I have several modules/libraries I developed and released under Boost License.
- CppDB Sql Connectivity - Stack Trace - Shared Object Loading - Nowide UTF-8 friendly standard C/C++ library API.
Yes, all of those would be interesting. I am especially interested in the DB connectivity and the shared objects. The UTF-8 friendly standard library is also very interesting and the stack trace could be useful for debugging in some situations. For the DB connectivity I wondered, why your result objects don't provide the input iterator interface, but next() and fetch() instead. I guess, there is a good reason, but I'd like to know it. I already had a look into your cppcms a while ago, which I mostly liked. Sadly I did not really get around to try and write an application with it. The biggest drawback for me is the use of "booster" instead of boost. I know that there might me situations where a stable ABI is important, but for me it is not. So I'd prefer to simply use boost there. Do you think, there might be a compile time option to chose either? Christof -- okunah gmbh Software nach Maß Werner-Haas-Str. 8 www.okunah.de 86153 Augsburg cd@okunah.de Registergericht Augsburg Geschäftsführer Augsburg HRB 21896 Christof Donat UStID: DE 248 815 055