AMDG Robert Ramey wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
What about companies that *do* use Boost? If we are to prioritize our efforts to provide the best service to them, should we be fixing warnings or improving our testing procedures? Should we be fixing warnings in general or working on tickets?
Hmmm - not sure there's a huge difference. I get tickets on a regular base to fix warning. Some them are even marked "bug" !!!
So if one strives to have a "zero ticket" policy (or as close as possible), you're going to end up with fixnig warnings.
Indeed. But hopefully, this will result in the warnings that are most annoying to users getting priority.
BTW - There are warnings in building a library - these are different than those generated in headers that users see.
Agreed. I would like to see all warnings from headers eliminated eventually. I don't care all that much about what happens in source files. In Christ, Steven Watanabe