15 May
2010
15 May
'10
7:58 p.m.
Maybe "fork" was bad wording considering that the code is not derived from boost. Still, as it serves as a boost replacement, I am saying that I would love to see improvements you put there to be put into boost instead, so they serve a larger audience.
This is just a question of priorities: I want to release CppCMS - I need stable boost-like library. 1. I can't fix all boost on-my-own. 2. I can extract small parts and implement exacly what I need. So I do this. So I do have my own reasons, and BTW Boost.Locale is written with backward ABI compatibility in mind. So once boost "stabilization" would be started as official part of boost I'll be the first who helps. Artyom