Re: [boost] Purchasing Travis Resources for boostorg (was Re: [1.65.0] Point release?)

Gary Furnish wrote:

I don't think anyone was proposing not to have develop on boostorg, I think they were proposing not having 5000 branches of new features actively under development on boost.

That's not a problem we're having at the moment. Our immediate blocker last time I took a look were the pull requests against boostorg/math. Math had many OS X jobs, which were taking quite a while.