2013/2/7 Neil Groves <neil@grovescomputing.com>
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Adam Romanek <romanek.adam@gmail.com
wrote:
Check the documentation of "remove_erase" algorithm. It says:
"(...) This is in contrast to the *remove* algorithm which merely rearranges elements. (...)"
On the other hand, the documentation of "remove_erase_if" algorithm says:
"(...) This is in contrast to the *erase* algorithm which merely rearranges elements. (...)"
Can you see the difference?
I can see the defect now that the relevant section has been highlighted. I understand that you meant that the documentation for remove_erase is incorrect rather than remove_erase_if. I shall correct this for the next release.
Hi, I think you got it the other way around: remove "merely rearranges elements", while erase -- deletes a specified range of iterators to nonexistence. So from the above quotes of the docs: remove_erase_if docs seem to be wrong. Regards, Kris