vicente.botet wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 9:05 PM Subject: [boost] [log] RFC: An alternative implementation is coming up
I would like to see what Boost community thinks of this library, whether it worth submitting, has any critical flaws or any other thoughts.
I also would appreciate if Gennadiy Rozental and John Torjo expressed their thoughts on possibility to review this library in parallel with John's solution, which is currently in the review queue. I would gladly discuss this privately, if they find it more suitable.
Hi Andrey,
Is this a formal review request?
No, not yet. There are some issues I would like to address before the review. However, I plan to request a formal review this winter.
BTW, which is the John's solution that will be review (for the moment I see only log2 which was already rejected)?
There's another request in the review queue. Essentially, this should be an updated version of the rejected library. Unfortunately, I haven't got any feedback from John or Gennadiy, so I can't tell anything else about it.