27 May
2007
27 May
'07
8:37 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Based on above research I could tell that only boost::ublas doesn't have BSL, while all the other files are simply a mistake that can be quickly corrected...
In that case I vote for ripping ublas out of Boost unless and until the authors fix it. This is crazy; people have had long enough.
I'm not sure about that: ublas was voted in under it's existing licence, the authors didn't know at the time that we were about to change things :-) Still we should have another go at contacting them whatever, John.