Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?

On 11/20/09, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:

Gottlob Frege wrote:

...

Review Lib A comment/ask for changes/ etc

Review Lib B comment/ask for changes/etc

reject/approve A, B

ie don't reject/approve A before reviewing B.

Lib A would be left in limbo for an indeterminate time, with this approach, which isn't particularly fair either.

True, but there seems to be long time between acceptance (often conditional) and final submission anyhow. It would be nice of course for libB to be reviewed asap after libA. But I don't disagree with you overall. Just trying to offer suggestions.