8 May
2007
8 May
'07
1:43 p.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote in news:00b601c790ad$8e357b00$6407a80a@pdimov2:
Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com wrote:
Hello,
Instead of bool is_null() const and static guid const& null() I would prefer bool is_nil() const and static guid const& nil().
null()/nil() are actually redundant and only contribute thread safety problems. The default constructor already creates a NULL UUID, as it should.
I agree that they are redundant. I am not pushing them, but just wondering why they would contribute to thread safety problems since they return a constant object? Andy.