Re: [boost] Sealed C++ class (why this inheritance is virtual - no-derivation article)

Arturo_Cuebas@bpmicro.com wrote:

I thought I saw this before, so I looked it up and thought I would reply with a link to where I saw it. I'll leave it up to you to decide whether this contributes at all to the discussion. http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#no-derivation

Great article, thank you. As written there - "Unfortunately, that solution is not pretty.". The solution provided there is really not so pretty, but now we have pretty one.