On 2/25/2011 10:44 AM, Daniel Larimer wrote:
I am attempting to use a fusion sequence with a visitor pattern that expects 'member function' or 'member data' pointers.
What I would like to do is something like:
&fusion::vector<int,double>::m1
But obviously this cannot work because of how fusion::vector<int,double> is implemented with a single vector_n<...> vec data member that is private.
So trying to "reflect" a vector in the same way that I "reflect" a struct does not work.
Any good ideas? Is there any reason why this 'implementation detail' needs to be hidden?
Well, the proper way is to use fusion::for_each(s) and you don't have to care what the internal structure of s is. I highly suggest that you use the fusion algorithms to walk through (visit) a fusion sequence. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com