28 Feb
2007
28 Feb
'07
4:37 p.m.
A while ago I made a suggestion about using the spirit parser with its associated xml grammers. No one has commented on this. I'm curious why this idea doesn't seem to be attractive to anyone else.. I used it with very good results in the serialization library. It created a much more robust and maintainable parser than I could have done by hand. What am I missing here? Robert Ramey Péter Szilágyi wrote:
Any suggestions how things should/could be started/planned?
As far as I can tell, its already done - there's nothing to do.
Sincerely, Peter _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost