On Tue, 24 May 2011 04:16:00 -0700, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Mostafa wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:42:06 -0700, Vladimir Batov <vb.mail.247@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a Pimpl generalization submission getting close to the top in the review queue. Rob Stewart suggested I'd post it to the new Boost Code Collaborator site for a pre-review. That's what I did with the following link to the pre-review (Review #5):
<http://demo.smartbear.com/boost/go?page=ReviewDisplay&reviewid=5>
Your participation in that pre-review is most welcome.
Is it possible to have anonymous read-only access to it?
If you want to use the Code Collaborator site to examine the library, you must create an account. The good news is that there are other libraries there that you can review, too. If you wish to avoid creating an account, then you can follow the link on the review schedule to the code in the sandbox.
Some may just want to follow a review without necessary participating in one. Requiring a user account discourages such activity, and in my opinion, creates an artificial barrier to further engagement between newcomers, or even existing Boost watchers, and Boost, even if it is a one-sided engagement. My thoughts, Mostafa