Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota@yahoo.com> writes:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:55:09 -0400, David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Enclosed is one easy simplification step.
Thanks. I'm now testing the very simple variation attached. What disturbs me with VC6 is that, either with the two versions you gave and with the one enclosed here, once you put the function template in the boost namespace you can't name it without qualification, despite a
using boost::dimension;
A using directive works but... Hoping this a known issue with a know workaround...
It's just the way explicit template args work in vc6. You might need an alternative interface that allows the explicit passage of mpl::int_<d>(). Here's a version without remove_bounds. Unfortunately the diagnostic is poor in the case of failure. I'm out of time on this one, but maybe you can improve it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com