On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Niall Douglas
On 12 Jan 2015 at 20:24, Rob Stewart wrote:
I do agree about BindLib being a poor name. It is actually onto its third choice of name now :( but to date, it's the least terrible of the reasonably descriptive library names I have thought of.
Any better names gratefully received.
Name[space]Mapping
NameMappingLib or just plain NameMapping?
How about APIMapping? BindLib also provides API version management via preprocessor metaprogramming.
Would even APIBind be better?
Niall
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
I like APIBind. Any of the above are good. Anything from { API, Name, Lib } X { Bind, Mapping } Boost.Using is too generic. Tony