"David Genest" <david.genest@ubisoft.com> wrote in message news:E7F3301F6AF1F341AB107794F4F80A6F19746B05@MDC-MAIL-CMS01.ubisoft.org...
Domagoj Saric Wrote:
it has various other space and time optimizations besides no-typeid support as well as cofigurability through policies (although it seemes to have sparked little interest)...
I read most of the thread and I'm surprised to see that you are right regarding interest. I'm surely interested which means there must be others. I'm impressed by the depth of your analysis/optimisations. Will this effort be brought in a new version of boost soon ?
sorry...i cannot know that ;) there seem to be several more 'higher-level' discussion threads active at the moment...perhaps 'resurrecting' the topic at a more peaceful time would be a good idea...
hope it helps...:
It will!
glad to hear that ;)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/194514/focus=195351 ;)
I didn't find any attachments in gmane, but found the vault version ( http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=new_function_implementation_proposal.tgz&directory=Function%20Objects& ) . Is this the latest version ?
pretty much...i paused the work on bf until there is atleast some discussion on the work so far (what's 'good' and what's 'bad') and any 'semi-official' hints that the changes/ideas might eventually be accepted...
Can I just apply the new files over the current function directory?
yes...it should be a drop in replacement... -- "That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history." Aldous Huxley