On Aug 17, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Paul A Bristow wrote:
But I think we could not reasonablely expect them to dish out a free copy to every single Boost developer - and yet that's what we all need (to check what a pdf version of their stuff will look like) - and what we have effectively got.
Unless we had a central place where we built Boost PDF documentation. Ideally, we'd have an automated (nightly?) process that built Boost documentation in PDF and HTML. MetaComm is (was?) building the HTML; we'd just need one license to build the PDF.
So on the grounds that it costs nothing to say thanks, I still feel it's the right thing to do.
Makes it harder it ask for that one copy to build PDFs of Boost documentation, if we've already given them the publicity in a public acknowledgment. - Doug