Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Hartmut Kaiser skrev:
I was waiting for Andy to fix two of the major complaints raised during the review (incompatible license in parts of the code and the generator initialization seed issue), because these would have prevented the acceptance into Boost. As Andy told me, he is almost done with the fixes. As soon as these are finished I'll have a look at the code and will announce the review results.
What has these to do woth the review results? I mean, normally a library is accepted with a bunch of stuff that *must* be fixed before cvs upload.
I think license issues are major obstacles and need to be resolved completely before any form of acceptance. IMHO, a library with license issues shouldn't even get accepted for review. Regards, m