12 Jul
2004
12 Jul
'04
8:03 p.m.
Matthias Troyer wrote:
Yes, the problem was that one of the constants was intialized with a 64-bit constant, and that did not fit into an int. If it is important I could reproduce it tomorrow and report it.
No need to reproduce the problem. I think this confirms that BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT's that are not bigger than ints can be BOOST_WORKAROUND'ed with the enum trick until IBM conforms to DR454. So should I implement such a workaround or is this not tought to be a satisfactory solution ?