Wusel ha escrito:
!! Here I'm missing somethig... Isn't version D exactly the same as version B, which does work?
Exact this I wanted point out. Version D differs from version B in removing two lines 31, 32 only (i.e. the name index). Version C is nearly the same, too. Nevertheless there is a difference when compiling.
OK, I missed the part about removing lines 31 and 32. Well, I am as puzzled as you. The code should work, but somehow the compiler chokes on it. FWIW, it works OK on other compilers, as it should be. The error message seems to indicate that an mpl::iter_fold algorithm running over the list of indices somewhow goes out of bounds. I've tried to reduce the problem to something amenable to study, to no avail: simpler formulations of the internals do not fail. If Aleksey is reading this and wants to take a look at it, I'll be happy to provide as much info as needed, other than that we're stuck. You can always use numbers instead of tags (confirmed to work.) Sorry I can't be more helpful. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo