13 Jun
2005
13 Jun
'05
11:41 p.m.
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
Mind if I just "merge" some of this into the next revision?
That is, along with another sentence in the Acknowledgements section, of course.
[...] is_function_type<Tag,T> is an MPL Integral Constant. The type member is the identity of its specialization and not listed explicity because it's part of the concept. It won't hurt, I guess.
^^^^^^ Should mean: Listing them explicity won't hurt (not the fact that they are not).