26 Apr
2008
26 Apr
'08
10:37 a.m.
Marco Costalba wrote:
If there is interest I can improve documentation and examples.
I am definitely interested. I think it should be submitted for review. Some comments: 1. Does "reset" sound like a better name for "unset"? 2. How about providing a get<signature> method returning ref to the underlying boost::function object. - this facilitates interfacing with other API already using boost::function. - f.get<signature>() = 0; may be used instead of "unset". Regards, Joseph