On Mar 11, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
"Howard Hinnant" <howard.hinnant@gmail.com> wrote in message news:592D3A44-8F72-4BF6-90C3-0390413886A4@twcny.rr.com...
Fwiw, I've whipped up an independent C++03 emulation of unique_ptr. It is based on Rani Sharoni's ideas here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463
It isn't perfect, but it could be useful prior to rvalue references.
http://home.twcny.rr.com/hinnant/cpp_extensions/unique_ptr_03.html
Hi Howard,
Who is the copyright holder? You? Your employer? I try to encourage programmers to make the copyright message the first line of code they write in a new source file. Mostly it doesn't matter, but every once in a while saves a great deal of later grief.
Ditto license. If you are in search of a good license, Boost happens to have one available:-)
Thanks Beman, I've purposefully not included a copyright statement, but my intent may not be properly framed. How do you say: I don't care about the copyright? Copy it, trash it, do include my name or don't, I don't care. It's only here for your amusement. I'm attempting to post anonymously. Btw, I neglected to include Ion's suggestion:
If we can define the pointer type via deleter::pointer or similar (with default T*) that would be even better.
which I think is a good one. Update on the way... -Howard _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost