15 Sep
2024
15 Sep
'24
7:42 p.m.
Enviado do meu iPhone
No dia 15 de set. de 2024, às 21:28, Peter Dimov via Boost
escreveu: Zach Laine wrote:
[…] Boost wants the best C++ libraries that appeal to its reviewers. WG21 wants to make sure something is appropriate for the standard. Those are similar, and even overlapping, but fundamentally different goals.
It doesn't really matter. For a library to get into the standard it needs to undergo design review by LEWG and be accepted by LEWG. Adding a Boost review on top of that can never be a "win" for the author, because it can only increase the probability of rejection.
It would if field experience weighed more in WG21’s acceptance criteria. Joaquin M Lopez Munoz