Re: [boost] [contract] importance ordering (was "diff n1962")

Lorenzo Caminiti skrev:

I would personally recommend for Boost.Contract to support importance ordering -- what do you think?

I think I would only need two orderings. One for preconditions that are equally or more expensive than the actual function and one for those that are faster (big-O wise). But it is not something I have found a need for very often. is_sorted() on binary_search() is the only immediate one I can find, but it seems too expensive even for debug builds. -Thorsten