Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Doug Gregor wrote:
Yes, it probably would be advantageous to have a single-entry-point layout, but we haven't found a good way to do it. svn:externals was one potential approach, but they aren't quite powerful enough to do what we need.
svn:externals would be useful to make sandbox projects appear as full boost versions (plus the new bits) to the user. Why not simply treat the two (main boost, and sandbox) as separate ? All it should take to build something against the two is an additional set of paths (-I and -L), which should be easily hackable into the build system.
The same strategy would be useful to build individual boost libraries in stand-alone mode, i.e. against all dependencies pre-installed. (See the discussion on boost modularity.)
Please also see this previous discussion <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/113512> -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo