Boris Kolpackov wrote:
The reason I announced the second release here is because I got interesting feedback from this list's members after the initial release and a number of new features and changes were the result of this feedback. So I wanted to let the people that responded know about it. Sorry if I offended you by my announcement.
Perhaps if you had an option to compile the .cli file to code that uses the existing Boost command line interface support, then you would have a better reception here? Personally I'm all for mini-languages, but if the compiler doesn't use boost, and doesn't generate code that depends on boost, your post looks a bit like spam - even if this is in practice a forum that reaches hard-core C++ coders who would be interested. I don't know if anywhere else would be appropriate - I definitely gave up on comp.lang.cplusplus (err, or whatever it was called) a looong time ago. (For extra points, generate code for POCO's command line handler too ;-) )