14 Mar
2017
14 Mar
'17
11:07 p.m.
On 15/03/2017 12:00, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
On 14.03.2017 17:53, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
"Only those who have managed a boost review can expect their library submissions to be to be reviewed."
The qualifications needed to write a boost-grade library and the qualifications needed to manage a review aren't the same. I don't think it's sensible to couple the two tasks in the suggested way.
Perhaps I am wrong, but I think it's already coupled the other way around: currently in order to be a review manager you must first have submitted (or otherwise maintain) a successful Boost library.