Re: [boost] Option 1: Alliance stewardship of Boost

Vinnie Falco wrote:

5. When the Boost community cannot achieve consensus, the responsibility for making a directional decision shall pass to the Boost Software Commons (“Commons”), a 501(c)(3) non-profit registered in Delaware on March 1, 2024, which is not controlled by the Alliance and whose board currently consists of Boost authors. The Commons is now in hibernation until it is needed.

I don't think this is necessary. Historically, outsourcing our decision making to some external entity has never worked, but even if it did, I don't see why we'd need a registered nonprofit for that.