Pavol Droba <droba@topmail.sk> writes:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:59:59AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
Pavol Droba <droba@topmail.sk> writes:
However I can see a way how to resolve a problem with future unicode character classes. Simple trait class can do the job nicely.
The way to handle this is with a simple range wrapper:
string_literal("Hello, world")
This is what I have actualy suggested in later posts.
I'm confused, then. When I read
We can make Range library to work as you request, but it would make it fully unusable on string literals.
I get the impression you think the range library should work on string literals directly. I am with Peter in the opinion that string literals can only properly be treated by a range library as an array of characters, including the null terminator. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com