Re: [boost] Ion Gaztañaga's Intrusive Library

Tobias Schwinger wrote:

Anyway, I still don't understand why we can't have intrusive containers without intrusive syntax. E.g:

struct slist_node // <-- part of container implementation { T element; // note: held by value slist_node * next; };

Then there's only one allocation per 'slist_node'.

What's the difference between that and the standard (non-intrusive) containers? Regards Timmo Stange