Anthony Williams wrote:
Thomas Witt <witt@acm.org> writes:
Roland Schwarz wrote:
The problem I see is, that boost 1.34 has specified an outdated (and unsupported) version of the stlport as belonging to the release set. To be honest this does not bother me too much. It might be unsupported but I seriously doubt it's unused. For the record the release set is not so much guided by sophisticated planning as it is by available regression tests. Sad but true.
I recently installed stlport 5.1 for work purposes, and could easily set up the my regression test runs to use that. However, it was agreed that we would not add any new test platforms this late in the day, so I haven't done so.
Right, please don't add anything at this point. What I meant to say is availability of regression tests at some point in the distant past ;-) Thanks Thomas PS: We should look at 5.1 as soon as we get 1.34 out the door. -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org