Thorsten Ottosen:
hm..is this from a cvs snapshot? If so, please update.
No, I'm using CVS HEAD. I just updated and recompiled with the same result. I'm using MinGW GCC 3.4.2, BTW, sorry for not mentioning before.
what is the virtual_control::s__xxxxxxxxxx ? Why don't you write
const std::set<std::string> foo = ...:
s_unbindables_permanent is a static variable in a class named virtual_control.
hm...don't call to adapter unless you are dealing with an adapter (queue, priority_queue, stack).
Oh, I'm not much of a C++ expert, as I'm sure you understand. ;) Didn't know the difference between a container and a container adapter.
Read about to_container() instead.
Thanks. Using it, the code compiles. I see it's mentioned as being a workaround. Is it really needed for GCC 3.4.2? Why then did it work before? (Not sure when I last worked on this code, might be as long as a month ago. I can try to find out exactly when it stopped working (the CVS date, I mean) if that would be useful.) Thanks for your help, -- Daniel Schlyder http://bitblaze.com/