Re: [boost] boost_check_library.py: correct handling of header-only libs?

AMDG On 08/09/2017 06:34 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

This script fails for me: https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/master/status/boost_check_library.py#...

Because there is no libs/beast/build.

It exists, but does not contain a Jamfile.

But Beast is header-only and has no src/ directory, is this correct?

A header-only library should not have a build/ directory at all.

Apologies for posting to the list, but there is no Issues tab on the boostorg/boost repo.

In Christ, Steven Watanabe