Re: [boost] C++0x question

On 10/17/07, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@etu.u-bordeaux1.fr> wrote:

Of course here the reflection format is quite primitive. It should be improved to represent all of member variables, member functions, typedefs, static variables, static functions. Also I don't really see how to expose template signatures.

And it doesn't work with implicit conversions: what if you pass a const char* "test" as argument for a std::string ? It would be erroneusly rejected ? Moreover I'm not sure it is valid for the general case of ill formed template expressions due to run-time variables values. Anyway thanks for your code, I didn't know that trick ! Marco