[boost] Re: [indirect container] RFC on naming of library and classes

|If you plan to extend the lib as outlined in the "future work" section |to cope with pointer-like objects like shared_ptr (an maybe iterators?) |then indirect_xxx would fit better, though ptr_xxx is evocative enough. |Just my 2 cents, anyway. The first release will not consider the extension with shared_ptr. If people really want it, we should consider it for a second release. what do you mean by "and maybe iterators"? -Thorsten