25 Mar
2009
25 Mar
'09
3:22 p.m.
Thomas Klimpel wrote:
This looks like a function declaration to me (a function with name "map" that takes no arguments and returns a map_type), but C++ might be intelligent enough to see that it is a default initialization.
Yes, my mistake.
// Compiler error -- tries to copy map_type map;
This looks like a default initialization to me. I have no idea, whether this default initialization should compile without error.
Well, the docs state that it would call the default constructor of all elements, which I think it does not, otherwise there would not be a boost::noncopyable block, or would there? Thanks, Rutger