At 03:26 AM 2/20/2004, David B. Held wrote:
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org> wrote in message news:4.3.2.7.2.20040219145425.031c90a0@mailhost.esva.net...
At 01:54 PM 2/19/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
"Paul A Bristow" <boost@hetp.u-net.com> writes:
A tiny typographic nitpick - Would it lie on the page more neatly as:
// Copyright I M Booster 2002-2004. // Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
Maybe. I was not trying to suggest, nor do I think I'd want to mandate, any particular use of line breaks in the comment.
I second that. While Paul's choice of line breaks was a bit prettier, that's the sort of thing we traditionally leave up to the developer.
How about the copyright line? Should that always appear with the license notice?
I'm having trouble envisioning a case where they shouldn't appear together. Do you have a specific situation in mind? --Beman