Re: [boost] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

What is the rationale for ditching boost::trackable? If I were to switch from signals to signals2 in the projejct I'm currently working on, some trackable declaration would have to be replaced by several track calls. That would add a lot of clutter and I feel the new mechanism is more error prone. --Johan Råde