Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
The fusion/tuple seems more generic? Functional languages have curried and uncurried functions. C++ is considered as a langauge that has "fused and unfused" functions?
void foo(int, int); // unfused void foo(tuple<int,int>); // fused
Note that functional languages regard unfused one as "tupled"; conFusing :-)
Well, once an unfused function is converted to fused one, it is unary. Some kind of job will be easy; e.g. function composing. Kinda con-fusing :-) But once you get the essence, it really makes sense :P
FYI, here is 'compose' implementation using con-fusing. It might be no practical use, though. :-) http://tinyurl.com/y9uamg
Yep, I know perfectly what you mean. I do that all the time (e.g Phoenix, which is actually one of the motivations behind Fusion). Pardon the con-fusing pun. It was all intentional :-) Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net