9 Mar
2011
9 Mar
'11
7:47 p.m.
AMDG On 03/06/2011 02:22 AM, Ivan Sorokin wrote:
On 06.03.2011 05:23, Chad Nelson wrote:
One more thought about "secure" option. There are no standard containers with this option. I think either both standard containers and integer_t should have such option or both shouldn't have. This is yet another argument for container parametrization.
I'm not sure I understand your argument. Are you saying that because there are no standard containers with a zero-memory-before-releasing option, that the library shouldn't provide one either?
Yes. Why integer_t should be an exception?
Just a thought: Maybe the Allocator should handle this, since it's related to memory management? In Christ, Steven Watanabe