Isn't the signature of boost::interprocess::file_lock already compatible with std::unique_lock<> etc? Or do i misunderstand something? R On 13 March 2018 at 18:07, mateusz janek via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hey, any thoughts on that?
Thanks, Mateusz
2018-03-04 3:42 GMT-08:00 mateusz janek <stryku2393@gmail.com>:
Hello boost::interprocess community,
During my pet projects development I found that a file access synchronization is a common problem so, I wrote a class that wraps it and thought that it can be useful for wider community. I would like to ask you what do you think about such functionality in boost::interprocess? I'm aware that class from the repo is not ready to release. Just wanted to show about what functionality I'm talking about.
Here you can find the repo: https://github.com/stryku/file_mutex You can find there the proposed class and a simple usage example.
If you will find it interesting I will prepare more formal merge proposal, update docs, maybe more examples etc.
Looking forward to hearing from you what do you think about it.
Thank you, Mateusz Janek
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost